Published in PLOS One on 2026-07-02, this study is presented as an attributed evidence briefing. The excerpts below are the original researchers’ words, reproduced under their Creative Commons Attribution licence. Health Signal has selected the abstract and, where needed, opening background paragraphs; the complete methods, results, limitations and references remain in the linked paper.
Original authors: Grace Semabia Kpeli, Prince Agyirey-Kwakye, Counseller Nutifafa Livingstone, Lillian Teye Cudjoe, Emmanuel Edem Dotse, Ebenezer Nyarko, Ebenezer Zar, Obed Nyarko-Otu, Hubert Kwame Agbogli, Godwin Glilekpeh, Solomon Korankye, Priscilla Essandoh, Daniel Elorm Kabotso
Source: PLOS One • DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0346766
Read the complete primary study ↗ · Creative Commons Attribution licence
From the researchers
Abstract
Flooding compromises the microbiological quality of domestic and recreational water sources, increasing exposure to waterborne and opportunistic pathogens in affected communities. Following widespread flooding triggered by the September 2023 controlled spillage of the Akosombo and Kpong dams in Ghana, which led to massive flooding, we assessed the microbial quality of water bodies in communities downstream of the Volta River and associated public and ecosystem health implications. In July 2024, water was collected from multiple source types across four downstream townships (Asutsuare, Aveyime, Battor, and Mepe), including river sections, ponds, puddles, wells, boreholes, and canal-associated sites. Samples were filtered, microbial DNA was extracted, and bacterial community composition was profiled using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, with downstream bioinformatics analyses used to characterize microbial diversity, assess spatial variation across sites, and stratify detected taxa according to ecological origin and public health risk. Sequence data obtained from 17 out of 22 samples revealed communities dominated by Proteobacteria with frequent co-occurrence of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes. Across all sites, 56 microbial taxa and 118 microorganisms were detected. Community composition varied by location and water source type, with bank and mid-river sites generally exhibiting higher richness than puddles and a canal drain. Thirteen samples contained site-specific taxa, indicating marked spatial heterogeneity within and between communities. Microorganisms of public health relevance were frequently detected, including enteric-associated bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, Shigella species, and Cronobacter sakazakii, as well as opportunistic and healthcare-associated bacteria including Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Higher-risk organisms were most widely distributed in Mepe and Battor, including in groundwater-associated sources. These findings provide molecular evidence of persistent, spatially heterogeneous microbial hazards months after flooding, underscoring continued exposure risks in downstream communities and the need for targeted water safety interventions and risk-informed public health responses.
Introduction
Events that occur post-flooding are a major concern for public health, stemming from the fact that there is the drastic deterioration of drinking and recreational water quality due to increased microbial contamination ([1,2]). Floodwaters act as vectors, transporting a diverse range of microbial pathogens and fecal contaminants from various sources, including agriculture, industrial effluents, human and animal waste, into receiving rivers and streams. This poses dire, long-lasting health challenges to affected communities ([3,4]). An increase in microbial contamination implies an increase in the risk of acquiring waterborne diseases such as dysentery, typhoid fever, leptospirosis, diarrhea etc. which may be life-threatening especially for the vulnerable (children, elderly individuals, immunocompromised individuals, pregnant women etc.) members of affected communities [5,6]. An additional post-flood concern is that affected individuals are at risk of developing skin, ear, eye and respiratory infections due to the presence of diverse pathogens [7].
Reading this evidence
Use the full paper to check the study design, participant selection, comparator and outcome definitions before drawing a practical conclusion. An association does not by itself show cause and effect. A reported performance measure needs its denominator and uncertainty. A finding from a particular facility, sample or time period should retain that scope when it is discussed elsewhere.
This briefing makes the source accessible within the wider public health desk. It does not assess an individual patient or certify a product. When considering relevance to another health system, examine the original authors’ account of context and limitations, then seek local implementation evidence. The related reporting below provides other studies to read alongside this one; it is a topic connection, rather than a claim that their results are directly comparable.
© 2026 Grace Semabia Kpeli, Prince Agyirey-Kwakye, Counseller Nutifafa Livingstone, Lillian Teye Cudjoe, Emmanuel Edem Dotse, Ebenezer Nyarko, Ebenezer Zar, Obed Nyarko-Otu, Hubert Kwame Agbogli, Godwin Glilekpeh, Solomon Korankye, Priscilla Essandoh, Daniel Elorm Kabotso. Excerpts reproduced under CC BY. Selection, formatting and contextual notes by Health Signal. The researchers are the authors of the source study, not members of Health Signal’s staff.
Explore connected evidence
- Evidence brief: Predominance of antimicrobial resistance genes and high-risk clones among Gram negatives from clinical sources in Accra-Ghana
- Evidence brief: Comparative prevalence of the mercury resistance gene merA in human feces, food, and environmental water from Japan, Vietnam, and Ghana
- Evidence brief: Serological responses to SARS-CoV-2 in urban and rural Ghana: Antibody waning and implications for long-term population immunity



