Financing & Policy

Evidence brief: Do China’s low-carbon technology products and environmental goods trade mitigate energy-related carbon emissions in Africa?

A sourced PLOS One study, published 2026-07-21. Read the researchers’ findings, methods and context, with links to connected African health evidence.

A hospital building and its landscaped surroundings
Illustrative stock photograph from Unsplash. It does not depict the reported event, study participants or a confirmed Kenyan facility. Source: https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1538108149393-fbbd81895907

Published in PLOS One on 2026-07-21, this study is presented as an attributed evidence briefing. The excerpts below are the original researchers’ words, reproduced under their Creative Commons Attribution licence. Health Signal has selected the abstract and, where needed, opening background paragraphs; the complete methods, results, limitations and references remain in the linked paper.

Original authors: Dinkneh Gebre Borojo, Jiang Yushi

Source: PLOS One • DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0339433

Read the complete primary study ↗ · Creative Commons Attribution licence

From the researchers

Abstract

Motivated by the rise in green trade between China and Africa and the growing environmental pressures associated with energy-related emissions in Africa, this study examines the impacts of low-carbon technology (LT) products and environmental goods (EGs) imported from China on the energy-related carbon emissions intensity (CEI) of 42 African countries for the period 2003–2023. To account for endogeneity issues and distributional differences, the study employs instrumental variables and panel quantile techniques. The findings reveal several important points. First, LT products and EGs imported from China significantly reduce the energy-related CEI of African countries. Second, the influence of imports of LT products and EGs on energy-related CEI varies by income level: they increase energy-related CEI in low-income African economies but decrease it in middle-income African nations. Third, the import of LT products and EGs has a stronger energy-related CEI-reducing effect in African countries with better institutional frameworks. These findings contribute to the current literature by offering a detailed and nuanced understanding of how trade in LT products and EGs can help reduce energy-related carbon emissions. Policy recommendations are presented based on these findings.

1. Introduction

Climate change stands as one of the most pressing challenges facing societies worldwide in the twenty-first century [1]. Among these emissions, carbon dioxide (CO2) produced by burning fossil fuels remains the dominant source of greenhouse gases (GHG) [1,2]. Specifically, the energy sector is the dominant global contributor to GHG emissions, accounting for about 73.2%; transportation accounts for roughly 16.2%, while energy consumption in buildings accounts for around 17.5% [3]. Hence, international climate initiatives have centered on reducing energy-related CO2 emissions, recognizing their significant influence on global emission patterns [1].

The trend of CO2 emissions in Africa has been rising over the years [4], and the continent’s warming rate exceeds the global average, making it the warmest worldwide. Specifically, Africa’s high temperatures are expected to surpass current levels by 2°C in 2050, with an estimated GDP loss of around 12% [5]. To prevent these damaging impacts, emissions growth must decline sharply, and the rate of warming must be limited to 1.5 °C. In Africa, the majority of CO2 emissions in the energy sector originate from burning fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas for power generation or to fuel vehicles and machinery [6]. Also, over 75% of Africa’s electricity is generated from fossil fuels, posing a significant threat to the continent’s sustainable development [7]. Therefore, taking measures to reduce energy-related carbon dioxide emissions intensity (CEI) can significantly contribute to achieving emissions reduction targets. However, the main question is finding the key mechanisms for mitigating energy-related CEI in Africa.

Reading this evidence

Use the full paper to check the study design, participant selection, comparator and outcome definitions before drawing a practical conclusion. An association does not by itself show cause and effect. A reported performance measure needs its denominator and uncertainty. A finding from a particular facility, sample or time period should retain that scope when it is discussed elsewhere.

This briefing makes the source accessible within the wider financing & policy desk. It does not assess an individual patient or certify a product. When considering relevance to another health system, examine the original authors’ account of context and limitations, then seek local implementation evidence. The related reporting below provides other studies to read alongside this one; it is a topic connection, rather than a claim that their results are directly comparable.

© 2026 Dinkneh Gebre Borojo, Jiang Yushi. Excerpts reproduced under CC BY. Selection, formatting and contextual notes by Health Signal. The researchers are the authors of the source study, not members of Health Signal’s staff.

Explore connected evidence

Health Signal Editorial Desk

Health Signal’s publication desk curates source-based health analysis and attributed research briefings. Study authors and originating institutions are credited within each article. Preparation used AI assistance; source and licence checks do not constitute independent replication or clinical endorsement.

More from this writer ↗