Published in PLOS One on 2026-05-13, this study is presented as an attributed evidence briefing. The excerpts below are the original researchers’ words, reproduced under their Creative Commons Attribution licence. Health Signal has selected the abstract and, where needed, opening background paragraphs; the complete methods, results, limitations and references remain in the linked paper.
Original authors: Pierre Chauvin, Thomas Huet, Joseph Gligorov, Carolyn Sargent
Source: PLOS One • DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0349041
Read the complete primary study ↗ · Creative Commons Attribution licence
From the researchers
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), an aggressive subtype with poor prognosis, is of higher frequency in African American women and women of Sub-Saharan African origin. In France, legal constraints on obtaining health data on race, ethnicity, or nationality in cancer registries and medical records make it difficult to estimate the frequency of TNBC according to women’s origins. These constraints result from a historical “universalist” approach to French citizenship which prohibits the routine collection of ethnoracial data. An anonymous, statistical survey we conducted from a single-hospital case series of 780 women with breast cancer followed in a university hospital in Paris showed that TNBCs were at least 3 times more common in patients born in Sub-Saharan Africa than in patients born in France. The former consulted at a more advanced stage of the disease than the latter. The results of an ethnographic study of African women in the Paris region with breast cancer, conducted for several years, highlighted some explanatory factors: low breast cancer awareness, perceived causes distinct from biomedical etiology, the weight of shame and secrecy, prior recourse to local healing, difficulties in communicating with health professionals and navigating the healthcare system. Although considered a public health priority, TNBCs are an emblematic example of the limits produced by French race and ethnicity blindness in public health, epidemiology, prevention and health care.
Introduction
Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC), characterized by the absence of receptors for estrogen, progesterone and the HER2 protein, form a subtype of breast cancer that is usually more aggressive than the others, responding less well to available treatments, and with poorer prognosis [1]. In mainland France, it is the least common subtype of breast cancer but highly significant in clinical and social terms: it represents 15% of cases and mainly concerns women under 40, pre-menopausal, too young to be part of the target population of the national organized screening program (which in France concerns women aged 50–75) and tested at an often advanced stage [2,3]. Accordingly, in this supplement to the scholarly literature, ethnoracial differences in TNBC frequency as well as cross-cultural questions of how breast cancer is distributed within and among social communities merit further examination.
This article presents epidemiological and social anthropological research findings on ethnoracial disparities in the causes and distribution of TNBC in particular populations, with special attention to France. We explore TNBC among Sub-Saharan immigrants in Greater Paris and their apparent vulnerability to this high-risk form of breast cancer. We frame this analysis in the context of contested constructs of race and ethnicity in various countries and how these play out in the recognition of breast cancer risk in certain populations. France is a unique case to center our discussion because of the historical and contemporary dissension about race as an individual and collective category of identification. We will discuss state regulations regarding data collection on race and ethnicity and the implications of these policies for understanding breast cancer risk, diagnosis, and treatment.
Reading this evidence
Use the full paper to check the study design, participant selection, comparator and outcome definitions before drawing a practical conclusion. An association does not by itself show cause and effect. A reported performance measure needs its denominator and uncertainty. A finding from a particular facility, sample or time period should retain that scope when it is discussed elsewhere.
This briefing makes the source accessible within the wider hospital systems desk. It does not assess an individual patient or certify a product. When considering relevance to another health system, examine the original authors’ account of context and limitations, then seek local implementation evidence. The related reporting below provides other studies to read alongside this one; it is a topic connection, rather than a claim that their results are directly comparable.
© 2026 Pierre Chauvin, Thomas Huet, Joseph Gligorov, Carolyn Sargent. Excerpts reproduced under CC BY. Selection, formatting and contextual notes by Health Signal. The researchers are the authors of the source study, not members of Health Signal’s staff.
Explore connected evidence
- Evidence brief: Factors influencing breast cancer screening among reproductive age women in Lesotho: Analysis of the 2023-24 demographic and health survey using the Andersen Behavioral Model
- Evidence brief: Spatial autocorrelation and determinants of low uptake of breast cancer screening among women of reproductive age: A mixed-effect multilevel analysis of Tanzanian population-based survey
- Evidence brief: Magnitude and predictors of anemia among adult solid cancer patients in Hawassa, Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study



