Published in PLOS One on 2026-07-31, this study is presented as an attributed evidence briefing. The excerpts below are the original researchers’ words, reproduced under their Creative Commons Attribution licence. Health Signal has selected the abstract and, where needed, opening background paragraphs; the complete methods, results, limitations and references remain in the linked paper.
Original authors: Eshetu Mekonnen, Dumessa Edessa, Fitsum Weldegebreal, Abenezer Aklog, Tigist Gashaw
Source: PLOS One • DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0354982
Read the complete primary study ↗ · Creative Commons Attribution licence
From the researchers
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance has emerged as one of the most urgent global health threats, undermining the effective treatment of bacterial infections. In response, scientific interest is increasingly focused on identifying natural and effective antimicrobial agents derived from medicinal plants. In Ethiopia, Ehretia cymosa (E. cymosa) is traditionally used to treat wound infections, fever, gastric ulcers, dysentery, and toothache. However, there is limited scientific evidence to support these traditional claims. Hence, the present study aimed to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities and to screen the phytochemical profile of the 80% methanol extract of E. cymosa leaves. The air-dried and powdered leaves of E. cymosa were extracted using cold maceration with 80% methanol. The antibacterial activity of the crude extract was tested using the disk diffusion method against selected bacterial pathogens commonly associated with infections. An in vivo model of burn followed by infection was established in mice. Qualitative phytochemical screening was also performed. One-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s post hoc multiple tests was used to compare the means of all parameters. The leaves of E. cymosa demonstrated significant antibacterial activity (p < 0.001) against the tested bacterial strains in a dose-dependent manner compared with the control. The minimum inhibitory concentration ranged from 6.25 to 75 mg/mL, while the minimum bactericidal concentration against P. aeruginosa and E. coli was 200 mg/mL. In the in vivo model, the extract resulted in faster wound contraction and a shorter epithelialization period against S. aureus than against P. aeruginosa. The plant leaf is also rich in flavonoids, terpenoids, and tannins. The 80% methanol extract of E. cymosa leaves exhibited antibacterial activity in vitro and in vivo, which corroborates the traditional use of the leaves against infectious diseases. Further studies involving the isolation and characterization of the active compounds are recommended.
Introduction
The discovery, development, and therapeutic application of antibiotics in the nineteenth century have significantly decreased the public health risks posed by bacterial infections [1,2]. However, the misuse and overuse of these drugs have led to a troubling rise in bacterial resistance to current chemotherapeutic agents. Additionally, antibiotics can sometimes cause adverse effects, including allergic reactions, immunosuppression, and hypersensitivity [3,4]. These challenges highlight the urgent need to intensify efforts toward developing new antibacterial agents that are effective against resistant pathogenic microorganisms [5].
One promising approach to combat the growing issue of antibiotic resistance is the systematic extraction and screening of bioactive compounds from traditional medicinal plants. This strategy aims to discover new, effective substances with potential antimicrobial properties [6,7]. The demand for plant-based treatments is growing in both developed and developing countries, driven by the traditional practices that these remedies are natural, safe, affordable, and associated with fewer side effects [8,9].
Reading this evidence
Use the full paper to check the study design, participant selection, comparator and outcome definitions before drawing a practical conclusion. An association does not by itself show cause and effect. A reported performance measure needs its denominator and uncertainty. A finding from a particular facility, sample or time period should retain that scope when it is discussed elsewhere.
This briefing makes the source accessible within the wider research & evidence desk. It does not assess an individual patient or certify a product. When considering relevance to another health system, examine the original authors’ account of context and limitations, then seek local implementation evidence. The related reporting below provides other studies to read alongside this one; it is a topic connection, rather than a claim that their results are directly comparable.
© 2026 Eshetu Mekonnen, Dumessa Edessa, Fitsum Weldegebreal, Abenezer Aklog, Tigist Gashaw. Excerpts reproduced under CC BY. Selection, formatting and contextual notes by Health Signal. The researchers are the authors of the source study, not members of Health Signal’s staff.
Explore connected evidence
- Evidence brief: In vitro antimicrobial potential and phytochemical analysis of root extracts of Rumex abyssinicus from southern Ethiopia
- Evidence brief: Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens on the plate: A semi-quantitative hygiene risk evaluation of raw beef consumption in Ethiopia within a One Health context
- Evidence brief: Bacterial isolates and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of pediatric meningitis at comprehensive specialized hospitals in Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia

