Published in PLOS One on 2026-07-09, this study is presented as an attributed evidence briefing. The excerpts below are the original researchers’ words, reproduced under their Creative Commons Attribution licence. Health Signal has selected the abstract and, where needed, opening background paragraphs; the complete methods, results, limitations and references remain in the linked paper.
Original study title: Knowledge, attitude, and practices towards rabies: A community survey in selected areas of KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa
Original authors: Mohube Titus Letsoalo, Daniel Nenene Qekwana, Christian A Mbajiorgu, Ishmael Festus Jaja, James Wabwire Oguttu, A K M Anisur Rahman, Aravindh Babu Ramasamy Parthiban, Raúl Alejandro Alegría-Morán, Venu Ramkrishna Shah
Source: PLOS One • DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0352279
Read the complete primary study ↗ · Creative Commons Attribution licence
From the researchers
Abstract
Knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) studies have been widely used to assess gaps in KAP towards rabies. However, there is no evidence of baseline studies that have assessed KAP towards rabies among selected communities in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa. A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study design was adopted. Participants (n = 768) were selected using systematic random sampling. Data from respondents (≥18 years of age) were collected using a validated questionnaire and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Overall, 26.95% (207/768) of the respondents could name the cause of rabies, while 53.52% (411/768) indicated that they would adhere to post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), which can include, depending on the category of the bite wound, wound washing, and receiving a dose of human rabies immune globulin (HRIG) and rabies vaccine at the time of the first medical visit. Most respondents (90.10%, 692/768) would seek medical attention following a dog bite. Most dog owners (82.11%, 459/559) owned a vaccination certificate for their pet. Allowing dogs to roam without supervision was widely reported by the respondents. Dog ownership was the only factor significantly associated (p = 0.0001) with knowledge of rabies. Gaps in some aspects of knowledge about rabies were observed, which require awareness creation among residents of the study area, irrespective of whether they own pets.
1. Introduction
Domestic dogs play a significant role in the lives of humans. However, they pose the threat of transmitting rabies to humans [1]. Rabies is an important infectious viral disease [2,3] caused by lyssavirus, from the family Rhabdoviridae [4,5]. All mammals are susceptible to rabies virus infection, which is generally transmitted through the bite of a rabid animal [6].
Dog-mediated rabies infection remains a significant disease from a public health perspective [7] and annually it is responsible for an estimated 60 000 human deaths worldwide [8,9]. Of these, Asia has the highest burden of rabies, followed by Africa, making the two the most affected continents [9,10]. In Africa, over 90% of human rabies deaths are associated with dog bites [11,12]. n Asia, 31 539 human deaths attributed to rabies are reported annually, suggesting a high rate of rabies infection compared to other continents [13]. Furthermore, globally, around 15 million people seek rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) to minimise the risk of rabies infection following exposure to dog bites [14].
Once symptoms of rabies develop, victims usually succumb to the disease [4]. Moreover, the risk of developing symptoms is high if the victim fails to obtain PEP early following a dog bite [15]. In humans potentially exposed to the rabies virus, PEP usually includes thorough wound cleaning and a combination of treatment with rabies immunoglobulin and vaccination [16]. In the absence of appropriate healthcare interventions, untreated individuals are at increased risk of death. Moreover, the disease is reported to have the highest case fatality of any disease [11]. Details of the treatment prescribed for dog-bite victims to prevent the development of rabies have been described by Bishop et al (2010) [17]. In addition, the WHO Expert Consultation on Rabies, third edition, 2018, provides clear guidelines on the prevention of rabies in humans.
Reading this evidence
Use the full paper to check the study design, participant selection, comparator and outcome definitions before drawing a practical conclusion. An association does not by itself show cause and effect. A reported performance measure needs its denominator and uncertainty. A finding from a particular facility, sample or time period should retain that scope when it is discussed elsewhere.
This briefing makes the source accessible within the wider public health desk. It does not assess an individual patient or certify a product. When considering relevance to another health system, examine the original authors’ account of context and limitations, then seek local implementation evidence. The related reporting below provides other studies to read alongside this one; it is a topic connection, rather than a claim that their results are directly comparable.
© 2026 Mohube Titus Letsoalo, Daniel Nenene Qekwana, Christian A Mbajiorgu, Ishmael Festus Jaja, James Wabwire Oguttu, A K M Anisur Rahman, Aravindh Babu Ramasamy Parthiban, Raúl Alejandro Alegría-Morán, Venu Ramkrishna Shah. Excerpts reproduced under CC BY. Selection, formatting and contextual notes by Health Signal. The researchers are the authors of the source study, not members of Health Signal’s staff.
Explore connected evidence
- Evidence brief: Tuberculosis-related knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported preventive practices among medical students at the University of Khartoum: A cross-sectional educational survey
- Evidence brief: Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards malaria in a peri-urban Cameroonian village: Persistent silent transmission despite satisfactory awareness
- Evidence brief: Serological responses to SARS-CoV-2 in urban and rural Ghana: Antibody waning and implications for long-term population immunity




